Distribution waterfall
Last updated: November 10, 2025
Quick definition
A distribution waterfall is a predetermined priority structure that governs how cash flows, profits, and distributions are allocated among different parties in a fund. This system ensures that certain obligations are met before others receive payments.
A distribution waterfall creates a specific order for paying out money to different stakeholders in a fund. This system works like a waterfall flowing from top to bottom, where certain parties must be paid first before others can receive their share. The structure protects different types of investors and service providers by establishing clear payment priorities.
The waterfall operates on a simple priority system. Payments flow from the highest priority recipients down to lower priority recipients, much like water flowing down steps. Fund distributions are typically divided into two categories: interest payments and principal repayments. Each category follows a predetermined sequence that determines who gets paid first, second, third, and so on.
This priority system ensures that the most critical obligations are met before anyone else receives distributions. For example, operating expenses might be paid first, then debt service, then management fees, and finally returns to equity investors.
Distribution waterfalls appear in several different contexts within hedge fund operations. Each serves different purposes and affects different groups of stakeholders.
Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) are investment vehicles that pool together many loans and sell securities backed by those loans. Hedge funds often use CLO structures, and these vehicles rely on waterfalls to determine how the money collected from the underlying loans gets distributed.
In CLO waterfalls, operating expenses typically get paid first, but only up to a predetermined limit or "cap." If the actual expenses exceed this cap, the excess amount may be paid later in the waterfall sequence—after more senior obligations are met but before equity holders receive any distributions, assuming sufficient funds remain available.
Collateral management fees are often split into two parts. The senior portion is paid early in the waterfall, typically after expenses but before debt service payments. The subordinate portion is paid later in the sequence, after debt service has been completed.
The manager may also receive a performance fee, but typically only after equity investors have achieved a certain rate of return. Payments to hedge counterparties—entities that provide hedging services to the CLO—are usually made before debt service, except for termination payments that result from default events. These termination payments are paid after debt service but before equity distributions.
Co-investment vehicles allow investors to participate alongside a main fund in specific investment opportunities. These vehicles may use different waterfall arrangements depending on how they are structured and how easily investors can access their money.
A co-investment vehicle might be structured as a hedge fund with annual incentive compensation, a private equity fund with no liquidity and a traditional distribution waterfall, or a hybrid structure that combines elements of both approaches. The choice depends largely on the liquidity characteristics of the underlying investment.
When hedge funds hold illiquid assets—investments that cannot be easily sold or converted to cash—these assets are often placed in special sub-accounts. For these illiquid holdings, incentive compensation may be structured using a mechanism that resembles private equity arrangements.
In this structure, the investor typically receives their initial investment back first. The manager generally only collects incentive compensation on amounts above the investor's original investment, ensuring that investors are made whole before the manager profits from performance.
The placement of fees and distributions within the waterfall structure has significant strategic implications for fund managers. Where a fee or distribution appears in the sequence can determine whether it gets paid consistently or faces the risk of being reduced or eliminated during periods of lower cash flow.
If a manager receives a collateral management fee, they must carefully consider where this fee sits in the payment hierarchy. A common approach divides the fee into two components: a senior portion and a subordinate portion. The senior portion is paid after operating expenses but before interest payments to note holders. The subordinate portion is paid later in the waterfall sequence.
Managers should avoid having their senior management fee paid after payments to hedge counterparties or interest on the most senior notes. When fees are positioned too low in the waterfall, periodic cash flows may become insufficient to cover the fee, potentially reducing or eliminating this important income source. This positioning becomes particularly critical for managers who operate only a few CLOs and depend on management fees to cover basic operating expenses such as employee salaries and lease payments.
Distribution waterfalls often address whether equity holders can receive distributions before all senior obligations have been fully satisfied. During the reinvestment period—when the fund is actively reinvesting proceeds rather than returning them to investors—it is not uncommon for equity holders at the bottom of the waterfall to receive some distributions.
However, these equity distributions may be subject to specific tests or requirements. For example, the fund might require that overcollateralization ratios exceed a certain threshold before equity holders can receive any payments. These provisions help protect senior stakeholders while still allowing some distributions to equity holders when the fund is performing well.
When managers receive incentive fees in addition to their regular management fees, they must negotiate the specific terms governing when and how these incentive fees are paid. Typically, incentive fees are structured with performance hurdles, meaning the manager only earns these fees after equity investors have achieved a certain minimum rate of return.
This hurdle-based waterfall structure aligns the manager's interests with those of the investors. The manager must first deliver solid returns to investors before earning additional compensation based on performance. The hurdle rate—the minimum return threshold—varies depending on the fund type and market conditions.
Private equity-style funds typically use a traditional private equity waterfall that provides for performance-based compensation as distributions are made to investors. This structure often involves returning investor capital first, then providing a preferred return, and finally splitting any remaining profits between investors and the general partner.
Hybrid funds—which combine characteristics of both hedge funds and private equity funds—often calculate annual incentive compensation based on both realized gains (from actual sales) and unrealized gains (from increases in asset values). These funds may incorporate traditional waterfall mechanisms alongside additional investor protections such as loss carryforward provisions and general partner clawback clauses.
Loss carryforward provisions ensure that managers must make up previous losses before earning incentive fees on new gains. Clawback clauses allow investors to recover previously paid incentive fees if the fund's performance deteriorates over time.
Waterfall structures must accommodate various regulatory requirements and operational constraints that can affect how distributions are made. For example, if coverage tests—which measure the fund's ability to meet its obligations—are not met, interest proceeds may be diverted to reduce the outstanding principal of notes in order of their priority ranking.
Similarly, if interest proceeds are insufficient to make required payments under senior waterfall priorities, principal proceeds may be used to make up the shortfall. These provisions help ensure that senior obligations are met even when the fund faces temporary cash flow challenges.
The waterfall structure must also account for regulatory requirements that may affect timing and amounts of distributions. Fund managers must design these structures to comply with applicable securities laws, tax regulations, and other legal requirements while still achieving their investment and business objectives.
DISCLAIMER: THIS PAGE OFFERS GENERAL EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT FINANCIAL AND LEGAL TERMS. IT IS NOT INTENDED TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL ADVICE AND IS PRESENTED "AS IS" WITHOUT ANY WARRANTIES. THE CONTENT HAS BEEN SIMPLIFIED FOR CLARITY AND MAY BE INACCURATE, INCOMPLETE, OR OUTDATED. ALWAYS SEEK GUIDANCE FROM QUALIFIED PROFESSIONALS BEFORE MAKING ANY DECISIONS. DATABENTO IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY HARM OR LOSSES RESULTING FROM THE USE OF THIS INFORMATION.